Alright, let’s talk about that Opelka versus Thompson matchup I was looking into. I decided to spend some time trying to figure out who had the edge. It wasn’t just a random pick; these big server matches always get me curious, you know? It feels like old-school tennis sometimes, just bombs away.

My Process: How I Tried to Figure It Out
First thing I did, obviously, was dig into their past records. Head-to-head is usually where I start. See if they’ve played before, who won, what surface it was on. Sometimes that tells you a lot, sometimes nothing at all if it was years ago.
Then, I looked at their recent form. This is crucial. A player might have a great record overall, but if they’ve been stinking up the court for the last few tournaments, you gotta take that into account. I checked out their last five or so matches. Wins, losses, who they played against. Did they battle hard in losses or just fold?
For Opelka, you absolutely have to look at the serve stats. It’s his whole game, pretty much.
- Ace count per match?
- First serve percentage?
- Points won on first serve?
- How many tiebreaks does he usually play? And win?
That guy can just serve his way out of trouble like nobody’s business. But then again, if the serve is off, or if the other guy gets a read on it, things can get dicey fast.
For Thompson, it’s different. He’s more of a grinder, crafty player. So I looked at his return game stats. Could he actually get Opelka’s serve back in play? That’s the million-dollar question. Also checked his performance on the specific court surface they were playing on. Some guys are clay rats, others love the fast hard courts.
Digging Deeper Than Just Numbers
Stats are fine, but they don’t tell the whole story. I tried to recall watching them play recently. Opelka can look unbeatable one set and then completely lose focus the next. Thompson, he fights for everything. He can be annoying to play against, always making you hit one more ball. That mental stuff matters, a lot.
I also thought about the tournament situation. Was it a big event? Early round or late? Sometimes motivation changes. Is one guy nursing a small injury maybe? You don’t always know this stuff, but you try to factor in what you can find or guess.

Honestly, predicting matches with guys like Opelka feels like flipping a coin sometimes. It often comes down to one or two points in a tiebreak. Can Thompson hang in there long enough to force those situations and then pull out some magic? Or will Opelka just blast him off the court with serves?
My Final Take (At That Time)
So, after looking at all that stuff, I leaned slightly towards Opelka. It wasn’t a strong conviction, mind you. More like a 55/45 guess. My thinking was simple: his serve is just such a massive weapon. On a decent serving day, he’s incredibly tough to break. I figured he’d probably sneak through in a couple of tight sets, likely with tiebreaks deciding it.
But I kept thinking about Thompson’s grit. If anyone could frustrate Opelka into making errors, it might be him. It really wasn’t an easy call. Predicting sports is a mug’s game sometimes, isn’t it? You do all this digging, and then some random thing happens, and your prediction goes out the window. Still, it’s fun to try and figure it out beforehand. That’s the process I went through anyway.